Can I still use oxidized coax cable?

cable_guy

This question bugged me after trying to exchange the connectors of a 25m long Aircell7 coax cable. During preparation I discovered a black inner conductor. I seems water entered the cable. Do I have to throw it away? Read more to discover a probably unexpected answer!

Water in the Cable

It’s the nightmare of all hams – water inside the coax cable. Over years, I heard over and over that once water has entered the cable, it becomes useless and has to be thrown away. From my times at university I remembered that due to the Skin Effect, RF energy tends to flow on the skin, rather than the inner core of the conductor. Since copper oxide conducts much worse than copper, theory seems to confirm the country saying.

But considering the price of 2,50€/m I felt a stich in my heart when thinking about throwing away this 25m role of Aircell7. Instead of accepting defeat, I pulled out my Vector Network Analyzer and measured the attenuation from 1…500MHz.

Oxidized coax cable

oxidized_coax_cable

It seems water entered from one side of the coax cable. While I had to cut off 2 meters to reach the part of the cable where the shield was not oxidized anymore, the inner conductor was completely oxidized from the beginning to the end.

Measuring attenuation

Aircell7 24,5m oxidierter Innenleiter

Click to enlarge the diagram

Before measuring S21 attenuation I scratched of the copper oxide and put tin-solder on the ends to ensure a proper contact. Surprisingly, the results where much better than expected!

Manufacture’s specification [25m] Measured values [25m]
10MHz 0,5dB 0,6dB
30MHz 1,0dB 1,2dB
144MHz 1,9dB 2,4dB
432MHz 3,4dB 10,3dB

Results

Will I throw the cable in the trash can? No! Below 30MHz, the attenuation increased with 0,2dB only marginally. Even on 144MHz it could still be used in an emergency situation. Only above, the skin effect really starts to be noticeable. With 7dB additional attenuation of 432MHz, it’s definitely not suitable for UHF anymore.

I hope this measurement might also helps you to take the right decision when you find next time a coax cable with an oxidized inner conductor. I didn’t expect this result. I just saved 50€ and will continue using the cable on Shortwave.

About Tobias (DH1TW)

Self-confessed Starbucks addict. Loves to travel around the globe. Enjoys the technical preparations of Amateur-Radio contests as much as the contests themselves. Engineer by nature. Entrepreneur. For more, follow him @DH1TW

Comments

  1. Hello Tobias!

    Have You tested it with legal power on it?
    I wonder if there is any difference. I have never tested it, but it would be nice to know.

    Thanks for Your efforts in our HAM community!¨

    Adi
    S55M (9A8WW)
    9A1P contest team

    • Hi Adi,
      good question – I think as long as there is physically no more water in the coax cable, there should be no difference. The slightly increased attenuation/resistance should not be noticable in heat generation. But to answer your question – no, I did not try it.

  2. Swabian lifestyle at its best! ;-)

    Still missing the article about the Swabian cable ties…

    73s Chris DL1MGB

Speak Your Mind

*